EDITORIAL GUIDE
~5 min read
2023 UAP Congressional Hearings — Grusch, Graves, Fravor Testimony
On July 26, 2023, the House Oversight Committee held the first open congressional hearing on UAPs in more than 50 years. Three witnesses testified under oath: David Grusch, a former National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency officer who claimed the U.S. government possesses non-human craft and biological remains; Ryan Graves, a Navy pilot who observed UAPs over restricted airspace for multiple years; and David Fravor, the Navy commander who intercepted the Nimitz Tic Tac in 2004. The hearing produced a documented congressional record that is the highest-profile open disclosure event in UAP history.
What Was Said Under Oath
The hearing's most significant moment came when David Grusch, questioned directly by Representative Tim Burchett, stated under oath that the United States government has in its possession 'biologics' recovered from crash retrievals and that he was aware of 'multiple colleagues who have been injured' in connection with alleged UAP programs. Grusch, who had filed a formal whistleblower complaint with the Intelligence Community Inspector General in 2022 that was assessed as 'credible and urgent,' provided no classified specifics in the open hearing but repeated that he had briefed congressional staff in closed session with classified material supporting his claims.
Ryan Graves testified that UAP encounters in U.S. military airspace are not rare — they are routine, and are systematically underreported because of stigma. He stated that pilots who report UAPs risk their careers and cited specific near-miss incidents in restricted airspace that were attributed to UAPs by pilots but never formally investigated. David Fravor provided the most detailed first-person account of the 2004 Nimitz encounter, including the object's sudden reversal from 80,000 feet to sea level, the white oval shape with no visible propulsion or exhaust, and the incident's corroboration by four aircraft and two ships. Fravor stated under oath: 'It was not from this world.'
The Legislative Context — NDAA 2024 and the Disclosure Act
The 2023 hearings were the direct legislative trigger for the UAP Disclosure Act, passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act 2024. Senator Chuck Schumer and Senator Mike Rounds co-authored the legislation — modeled explicitly on the JFK Records Act — which would have compelled the executive branch to disclose UAP records held in classified programs. A watered-down version passed: it established the UAP Records Review Board and strengthened NARA RG 615's mandate, but eliminated the original provision requiring disclosure of alleged non-human intelligence programs and reverse-engineering activities within 25 years.
The Disclosure Act's gutting — attributed to pushback from the intelligence community and specific House Armed Services Committee members — was itself treated as significant by disclosure advocates. The argument made publicly by Senators Schumer and Rounds was that there is classified program material related to UAP that the executive branch has refused to share with Congress — a claim that, if accurate, confirms the structural existence of programs Grusch described rather than the specific details.
Grusch's Whistleblower Filing — What the IC IG Found
Grusch's formal whistleblower complaint, filed with the Intelligence Community Inspector General in 2022, was assessed as 'credible and urgent' — the highest possible credibility finding under ICIG procedures. The ICIG's credibility finding does not constitute verification of Grusch's factual claims; it means the complaint meets the legal threshold for congressional referral and that Grusch presented it in good faith with supporting evidence.
The Inspector General report was transmitted to the congressional intelligence committees — both the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence — where select members reviewed classified supporting material. Specific members including Rep. Mike Turner (chair, HPSCI) stated publicly after reviewing classified material that they could not confirm Grusch's specific claims. Others — including Rep. Anna Eshoo — indicated the briefings were more substantial than the public record suggested. The full classified supporting material has not been disclosed.
What the Hearing Did Not Resolve — and Why It Mattered Anyway
The July 26 hearing produced no confirmation of non-human intelligence, no new document releases, and no verified account of a recovery program. What it did produce was a congressional record that cannot be erased: three witnesses, including two decorated military pilots, testified under oath about phenomena they directly observed that exceed known technological capability, and a former NGA officer claimed under oath that classified programs hold non-human material.
The hearing elevated UAP from fringe territory to the congressional record and forced the institutional response — the NDAA 2024 provisions, NARA RG 615's expansion, and the AARO mandate to investigate legacy programs — that produced the PURSUE archive materials now publicly available. For researchers: the hearing transcript is a publicly accessible primary source document in the U.S. congressional record, and the witnesses' statements are legally sworn testimony. The hearing is the pivot point between the pre-2020 stigmatized era and the current documented-disclosure era.