HOMEINCIDENTSDoD-B21-021
UNCLASSIFIED
DoD-B21-021 · 2023-10-31

AARO Historical Record — First Congressional Report 2023

DoDPentagon, Arlington, VirginiaNorth America#2023UnknownN/A — institutionalN/A — institutional
EVIDENCE GALLERY

Visual reconstruction and recovered media extracted from the incident dossier. This case includes still evidence and analytical reconstruction.

Representative official gallery image traced to an official public-source archive

MEDIA STATUS
Official gallery media is shown as representative archive context for this case.
SOURCE TYPE
Witness testimony, radar language, and dossier reconstruction.
VIEW MODE
Still view highlights silhouette, environment, and encounter geometry.
AT A GLANCE

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) submitted its first Volume 1 historical record report to Congress on October 31, 2023. The report reviewed UAP claims dating back to 1945 and found that many characterized as secret government programs were misidentified classified US programs. However, AARO acknowledged a residual unexplained category and committed to reviewing additional witnesses. The report's conclusions were disputed by UAP researchers and Congressional members who characterized the review as incomplete.

PRIMARY WITNESSES
AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick, Congressional intelligence committees
EVIDENCE PROFILE
VISUAL RECONSTRUCTIONUNKNOWN
FILE ID
DoD-B21-021
DATE
2023-10-31
AGENCY
DoD
REGION
North America
SHAPE
Unknown
ALTITUDE
N/A — institutional
OBSERVED BEHAVIORS
Stationary Hover
DECLASSIFIED DETAILS

On October 31, 2023, AARO director Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick submitted Volume 1 of the Historical Record Review to Congress — the first comprehensive AARO examination of historical UAP claims. The report reviewed information from 1945 to the present and examined allegations of covert UAP reverse-engineering programs. AARO's primary conclusion was that many claims of secret non-human craft programs reflected mischaracterized classified US government programs. The report identified no verifiable evidence of non-human intelligence craft. However, the report acknowledged a residual category of UAP cases that remained unexplained and committed to reviewing additional witnesses through AARO's secure reporting mechanism. The report generated significant controversy: Congressional members on the intelligence committees publicly disputed AARO's access to the full scope of alleged legacy programs, suggesting the review had been conducted without access to the most sensitive compartmented programs. Former intelligence official David Grusch maintained his testimony was not reflected in the AARO findings. The debate over the historical record review became the central institutional controversy of the UAP disclosure debate in late 2023 and 2024, with competing claims about the completeness of AARO's access to classified records and whether the review had been conducted in good faith.

KEY CHARACTERISTICS
  • First AARO Volume 1 Historical Record Review submitted to Congress
  • Reviewed UAP claims from 1945 to present — no verifiable non-human craft evidence found
  • Residual unexplained category acknowledged — committed to additional witness review
  • Congressional members disputed AARO had access to full scope of legacy programs
  • Grusch testimony not reflected in AARO findings — central institutional controversy
  • Report and its disputed findings defined UAP disclosure debate in late 2023–2024
ORIGINAL SOURCE

This incident is indexed as file DoD-B21-021inside Now Declassified's research layer. The nearest official source trail for this agency points to NARA RG 615 / OSD, where archive records, imagery, or supporting context are published for public review.

OPEN OFFICIAL SOURCE CONTEXT →
EVIDENCE STRENGTH
INSUFFICIENT
Video Record
0
Still Imagery
0
Witness Credibility
5
Sensor Corroboration
0
Physical Evidence
0
SHARE THIS FILE
ARCHIVE EXPORT
HAVE YOU SEEN THIS?

Does this case match something you witnessed? Run the sighting matcher to compare your experience.

MATCH MY SIGHTING
FILE DROP ALERTS

Don't miss the next release.

We'll notify you when new declassified archive material or official UAP source updates land on the site.

CONNECTED FILES

Related Incidents

Matched by shared agency, region, shape, or observed behaviors

VIEW ALL CASES →
DoD-B21-021
DOD-021
DOD-037
DOD-027
DoD? Unknown
SECRET
DOD-021 · 2023-02-12

Lake Huron Shootdown — Fighter Jet Video

Lake Huron, Michigan, USA

On February 12, 2023, a U.S. Air Force F-16 shot down an unidentified object over Lake Huron, Michigan, on orders from the White House. The incident was part of a four-day period in which the U.S. military shot down four objects over North American airspace following the Chinese balloon shootdown. A classified video recorded by the fighter jet during the intercept is included in the May 2026 Pentagon archive release — the first time cockpit footage from this engagement has been made public.

HOVERING
STRONG
◈ MEDIA▶ VIDEO
OPEN DOSSIER →
DoD? Unknown
SECRET
DOD-037 · 1942-02-25

Battle of Los Angeles — AA Barrage on UAP

Los Angeles, California, USA

US Army anti-aircraft batteries fired 1,400 rounds at an unidentified object hovering over Los Angeles. The object was illuminated by searchlights for over an hour and did not fall. The Secretary of the Navy attributed it to 'war nerves'; the Secretary of War stated a physical object was present. The official explanation remains contradicted by its own chain of command.

HOVERINGANTI GRAVITY
PARTIAL
◈ MEDIA
OPEN DOSSIER →
DoD? Unknown
UNCLASSIFIED
DOD-027 · 1965-09-03

Exeter New Hampshire Low-Level UAP Encounter

Exeter, New Hampshire, USA

Two Exeter police officers and a civilian witness observed a massive, low-flying object with a ring of red pulsing lights hovering at treetop level and silently maneuvering for approximately 45 minutes. Project Blue Book initially classified the case as 'insufficient data,' then revised to 'unidentified' after the officers filed formal objections.

HOVERINGRAPID ACCELERATION
INSUFFICIENT
◈ MEDIA
OPEN DOSSIER →
RESEARCHER DISCUSSION

Loading discussion...

Comments are editorially moderated. By submitting you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy. Do not submit personal information, classified material, or off-topic content.