"Epstein client list" is one of the most-searched phrases about the case. There are two official documents people are usually thinking of — and neither is a list of people who committed crimes. This guide explains both, quoting the Justice Department's own words. We do not reproduce names.
On July 7, 2025, the Justice Department and the FBI released a memo stating that a systematic review "revealed no incriminating 'client list,'" and that they found no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals. Congress responded by passing the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which required the underlying files themselves to be released.
When the Justice Department adds Epstein files or the Pentagon publishes new UFO files, we email you a short summary and a link to the official records.
Section 3 of the Act required the Justice Department to give the House and Senate Judiciary Committees a report that includes "a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials." The Department sent that report on February 14, 2026, signed by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.
The report explains how the list was built: it includes every person who is or was a government official or "politically exposed person" and whose "name appears in the files released under the Act at least once." The Department adds that names appear "in a wide variety of contexts" — some individuals "had extensive direct email contact with Epstein or Maxwell while other individuals are mentioned only in a portion of a document (including press reporting) that on its face is unrelated to the Epstein and Maxwell matters."
In other words, being on this list means a name appears somewhere in millions of pages. It is not a finding of wrongdoing or even of contact, and lawmakers criticised it for not distinguishing between the two.
The same report says no records were withheld or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm or political sensitivity. It lists what was redacted: victims' personal information, child sexual abuse material, material that would jeopardise an active federal investigation, and images of death or injury — plus material covered by deliberative-process, work-product and attorney-client privilege. It also says unredacted versions are available for members of Congress to inspect at the Department.
In June 2026, in a lawsuit brought by journalist Katie Phang, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan granted a preliminary injunction and wrote that the Attorney General "has conceded that he is in violation of the Act," because the Department had not answered the core arguments. He ordered the Department to release certain redacted information — including redacted names of people identified in a draft indictment — or give a detailed justification for each redaction.
Our standard for this section: we report only what Justice Department releases, court records, the law itself and the Inspector General say. We do not name victims, and we do not publish lists of people who appear in the files — appearing in a document is not evidence of wrongdoing. Allegations are labelled as allegations.
The Justice Department and FBI said in July 2025 that their review "revealed no incriminating 'client list.'" A February 2026 report to Congress lists officials and politically exposed persons whose names appear in the released files at least once — which the DOJ says includes people mentioned in unrelated contexts, so it is not a list of clients or wrongdoers.
The Department's February 14, 2026 report lists every current or former government official or politically exposed person whose name appears in the released files at least once. We do not reproduce the names: the DOJ itself says names appear in a wide variety of contexts, and appearing in a document is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Facts on this page were checked against the sources below on October 24, 2026 by Himanshu Singh. Spot an error? Email hello@nowdeclassified.com.
We'll email you when the government releases new Epstein files or Pentagon UFO files — with a link to our sourced explainer.
AATIP director's first-person account of the Pentagon UAP program.
Religious-studies professor's investigation of UAP elite belief networks.
Insider claim of Roswell recovered technology distribution program.